How to drive SEO growth with structure, skimmability and search intent

B2B content material incorporates a Catch-22:

• It is advisable write for search to justify the expense to provide an evergreen asset that can develop long-term ROI, however…
• You additionally want to write down for a classy viewers to construct credibility to ever finally see stated ROI.

Most manufacturers skew too far in a single route or the opposite. 

Write primarily for search and also you get spinoff, regurgitated, copycat content material that instantly erodes belief with discerning prospects. 

Write just for prospects, nonetheless, and your content material is ephemeral – eternally counting on short-term bumps in referral visitors that get forgotten inside every week.

Semrush has in some way managed to bridge this divide for over a decade. Their year-over-year income was up 21% in Q1 of 2024, whereas progress in massive clients paying $10,000 yearly can also be up 32% YoY.

On this article, Semrush’s Managing Editor, Alex Lindley, shares how his three S method – construction, skimmability and search intent – can gas search engine marketing progress, plus useful examples and takeaways. 

1. Construction: Reply search intent with out delaying the ‘time to worth’

Writing for search and readers is a fragile balancing act.

On the one hand, it is advisable to entice readers by organising the issue and illustrating signs earlier than offering various options.

However, it is advisable to clearly reply search intent and construction articles just like what’s already rating so you may have a shot at evergreen visitors.

Nowhere is that this conundrum extra apparent than throughout the enhancing stage. An editor may assume the paragraph and phrasing is the difficulty, whereas the underlying root trigger is definitely a poor article construction to start with.

You possibly can consider this “construction” drawback as twofold:

• You spend an excessive amount of time speaking (or writing) about stuff that doesn’t matter, whereas additionally
• Not spending practically sufficient time on the stuff that does.

Lindley begins with traditional journalism recommendation, structuring articles in an inverted pyramid to assist improve the “time to worth” readers will obtain. 

• “For content material the author is creating for search engine marketing functions, I all the time level to the inverted pyramid and/or the underside line up entrance (BLUF) framework.”
• “The reason being easy: The one greatest mistake I see writers make is delaying the time to worth by including an excessive amount of exposition earlier than attending to the purpose. Delaying the time to worth basically negates any try you make later to handle search intent as a result of an enormous variety of readers received’t persist with you lengthy sufficient to see for those who ever do get to the data they’re in search of.”
• “I notice, nonetheless, that this method can alienate some readers – and, importantly, writers I’m working with – preferring a little bit of narrative or just love language and writing for writing’s sake. Balancing robust construction and search intent with narrative and the “delight” issue is difficult, however when there’s any doubt, I all the time advocate leaning on BLUF first and every part else second. It’s the absolute best method while you’re not fully positive of the very best method.”

This recommendation is particularly related for long-form B2B content material. 

The decades-old Problem, Agitate, Solution (PAS) copywriting framework helps set context. You wish to present some background commentary so the reader instantly understands and resonates with the purpose you’re making, in order that the final word payoff (or “resolution”) hits that a lot more durable.

The issue is that you just may take too lengthy to get there.

The trick, then, is to get in and get out – ASAP! Concision is the secret.

Sadly, this isn’t the one “construction” challenge that causes concern.

Delaying the “time to worth” is more and more frequent as a result of that’s how an increasing number of “search”-driven content material is being structured.

Take a look at the 2 side-by-side Investopedia examples beneath. Each are glossary or definition-based content material, so discover the similarity within the heading buildings used throughout every:

One other means most search content material falls flat is by spending too lengthy on the preliminary sections of an article (the “what’s” or “why it’s essential” sections) whereas not spending sufficient time answering the first question behind the article.

• “The No. 1 greatest pink flag I see with article construction is a compulsion to do the “who, what, the place, why” in large sections earlier than attending to the meat of the article,” confirms Lindley. 
• “For instance, you’ve got an article titled ‘Prime search engine marketing Instruments for 2024.’ Then the construction appears like this:
  • H1: Prime search engine marketing Instruments for 2024
    • H2: What Are search engine marketing Instruments?
    • H2: Why search engine marketing Instruments Are Necessary
      • H3: Attain a Broad Viewers
      • H3: Save on Promoting Prices
      • H3: Make Knowledge-Pushed Selections
    • H2: Easy methods to Select an search engine marketing Device
      • H3: Think about Your Price range
      • H3: Examine ‘Should-Have’ Options
      • H3: Check Them
    • H2: 11 Greatest search engine marketing Instruments
• “We get 1,500 phrases or extra in earlier than we’ve even gotten to the purpose of the article. What number of readers will sit by way of that and even scroll that many occasions earlier than they get to the half they got here for? Only a few.”
• “Sadly, this sort of construction is admittedly frequent on-line. It’s a search intent and time to worth drawback. And it usually comes from both believing that engines like google ‘need’ to see that type of factor or feeling the necessity to attain a specific phrase depend.”
• “However we merely don’t want to do this. Actually, we actually shouldn’t if we goal to maintain readers engaged. If the title guarantees one thing, give that factor to the reader immediately. Don’t delay; don’t clear your throat. Simply put it entrance and middle. And if it is advisable to cowl the tangential whys and hows, do this in a while.”

One option to mitigate that is to construction content material in briefs and descriptions with predetermined phrase depend max ranges. 

That means, you may nonetheless wish to embody the “what’s” part to outline a subject for search intent, however then remind writers to shortly transfer right down to spending extra time (or phrase depend) on the sections that matter most.

A closing tip on article construction and the subheading group beneath is parallelism. Right here’s how Lindley thinks of it:

• “Headers – the constructing blocks of article construction – ought to all the time be parallel. Listicles make a simple instance. Right here’s the ‘unhealthy’ option to method it, in contrast with the ‘good’ one proper after.”
• H1: 3 Content material Writing Ideas
  • H2: 1) Use Brief Sentences and Paragraphs
  • H2: 2) Learn It Out Loud Earlier than You Publish It
  • H2: 3) Nailing the Search Intent (unhealthy instance)
    
• H1: 3 Content material Writing Ideas
  • H2: 1) Use Brief Sentences and Paragraphs
  • H2: 2) Learn It Out Loud Earlier than You Publish It
  • H2: 3) Nail the Search Intent (good instance)

This final level appears small and nuanced on the floor. However as you’ll see within the subsequent part beneath, it truly has an enormous bearing on how “skimmable” the content material is total and whether or not you’re maintaining the reader engaged to the top of the content material.

---

2. Skimmability: Present contextually related examples with out interrupting the studying move

AI content material can let you know what “superior excel formulation” are, as evidenced by this pattern beneath:

Nonetheless, it’ll by no means:

• Present you superior Excel formulation. 
• Clarify why they matter for who they assist.
• Illustrate create superior Excel formulation. 
• Put them right into a usable format like a free template or instrument.

You future-proof SEO by avoiding head-on competitors with what AI can do nicely. And as a substitute you do what AI can’t do.

Backing up factors being made in an article helps the reader visualize what you’re describing and will increase the credibility in your claims. 

It additionally arms your content material with differentiation that different publishers can’t match.

• “The context half is commonly missing in internet content material,” explains Lindley. 
• “Many internet publishers will throw a faintly related picture on the high or backside of a bit and name it completed – virtually as in the event that they’re working from some type of guidelines. However we have to goal for the next stage of helpfulness.”

The difficulty is that figuring out how to include good examples all the time throws writers and editors for a loop. Fortunately, Lindley has framework to remember:

• “Idea > Context (for the picture or instance) > Picture or Instance.”
• “In different phrases, begin with the idea you’re introducing. State it plainly. Then, present context for the instance or picture you’re about to introduce. Then embody the instance or picture.”

The second main skimmability challenge can truly be noticed nicely upfront, previous to ever studying a single line of the content material itself.

Return to the general construction once more!

• “One skimmability drawback that’s simple for example with examples (and extremely relevant to many internet writers) is while you’re unable to know what a bit or article is about from simply the header title(s). That’s why I all the time take a look at the desk of contents or stacked headers on the left aspect of the Google Doc earlier than I begin enhancing an article.” 

In different phrases, begin by familiarizing your self with what’s being proposed, the nested info underneath every part, and the way these sections construct on high of each other to get a normal sense of the issues, challenges or examples that can in the end be most applicable in a while.

Lindley continues this instance with one other one:

• “For instance, if I see the H2 ‘Content material Advertising’ in an article titled ‘Varieties of Digital Advertising,’ I’m fairly positive that part will describe how content marketing is a kind of digital advertising and marketing. But when I see the H2 ‘Hearth Up Your Keyboard’ in that very same article, I’m confused, and I do know there’s an issue.”

How have you learnt whether or not you (or your writers) are heading in the right direction? 

Once more, again out of the particular paragraphs to soak up the proposed article as an entire. 

The desk of contents or header construction can assist, as can actually minimizing the textual content sizing in your browser to zoom out and think about all the content material collectively, like so:

Final however not least, listed here are three further “don’ts” Lindley recommends following to assist keep away from interrupting the studying move or danger shedding the reader:

• Don’t make the reader squint to search for particulars in photos that assist them perceive what they’re . 
• Don’t make them scroll again as much as the paragraph textual content to search for assist understanding what they’re . 
• Don’t make them learn your clarification beneath the picture or instance after which return as much as the picture or instance to lastly perceive it. 

3. Search intent: Focus enhancing on reader readability, much less on phrasing or semantic key phrases

During the last decade of working throughout a whole bunch of manufacturers, I’ve seen that good writers usually make unhealthy editors and horrible content material managers.

The rationale comes right down to a ability set mismatch, the place good writers excel at ingenuity and saying the identical issues in several methods, whereas good editors as a substitute laser-focus on consistency and readability.

For instance, check out the next “edits”:

As you may inform, these are completed by “author,” maybe, however as an editor, it’s usually lacking the purpose.

The most effective editors are sometimes akin to a coach. Their job is to sit down on the intersection of the model, the reader and search intent, then be sure to erect “bumpers” on both sides to maintain writers clear on the first route of journey.

• “The most effective editors keep a radical give attention to the reader. They’ll even break well-established writing guidelines to serve that focus,” affirms Lindley.
• “Stepping into extra particular areas of focus, editors ought to put construction, skimmability and search intent on the middle of practically every part they do.” 
• “The opposite stuff – photos, line edits, spelling, grammar, and so forth. – is essential. However you may have all that further stuff fully excellent and nonetheless have a nasty article since you’ve uncared for construction, skimmability or search intent.”
• “That’s to not say editors shouldn’t care about different considerations. They need to, but when I solely had half-hour to spend enhancing an article, I wouldn’t change a single phrase earlier than I addressed these three Ss.”

Lindley can also be a proponent of role specialization, the place “strategists focus extra on key phrases, distribution, and the like,” whereas the author can “give attention to the sentence-level stuff.”

The editor may assessment all of those particulars previous to publishing, however none of them outweigh construction, skimmability and search intent.

How do you assist implement (or reinforce) these rules in follow? Particularly at scale or greater volumes throughout a broad crew?

The easiest way I’ve discovered is to make editors monitor time towards each article, author, and content material kind. Then, set established benchmark thresholds for every.

For instance, after publishing hundreds of articles annually over the previous few years, we’ve seen that if editors constantly spend over an hour enhancing sure articles, it truly signifies:

• A course of drawback (establish underlying gaps in briefs/templates).
• An inner documentation drawback (ICP/product positioning communicated + re-trained).
• A job/expectations drawback (editors wanna rewrite vs. edit).
• A delegation drawback (editors/content material managers ‘must do it themselves’ vs. constructing a scientific workflow with the primary three above).

And infrequently not a “author” or “editor” drawback.

Right here’s arrange this inner suggestions loop to ensure everybody is concentrated on the best and greatest use of their respective occasions (and expertise):

• You must have estimated enhancing time ranges, together with caps, to edit every content material kind, format, or size.
• Add time monitoring per article and per author (much more true if editors are fastened value / in-house / full-time).
• Use this baseline knowledge to establish tendencies, patterns and unhealthy habits (rewriting vs. enhancing).
• Drive editors to flag underlying points or gaps – not simply repair surface-level points – that ought to have been higher spelled out, structured or illustrated for writers in previous steps.
• Evaluation these points weekly to create new supporting assets to repeatedly re-train your editorial crew.

This suggestions loop has two advantages:

• Editors’ editing-per-piece effort will drop like a rock, leading to a greater expertise for them.
• It additionally permits editors to edit extra content material in the identical period of time, which is a greater ROI for you.

The top result’s that extra enhancing feedback ought to observe Lindley’s advisable three S method, offering broad, strategic suggestions just like the remark beneath early on – versus the person rewording of sentences in the beginning of this part.

A balanced content material technique delivers evergreen outcomes and boosts income

There’s a relentless rigidity when writing for search and readers. Lean too far in both route and the ultimate consequence can usually sacrifice one on the expense of the opposite.

The trick, as with most issues in life, is to lean into the grey space full of nuance. Whereas additionally avoiding knee-jerk reactions that attempt too exhausting to oversimplify.

If you would like readers to eat, interact, save, and share search-driven content material, the reply isn’t to begin slicing essential context like your introductions. As an alternative, you have to be writing introductions that should be learn.

Constructing your publishing course of (and enhancing) across the three S method are an ideal begin to strolling this wonderful line. 

As a result of construction, skimmability, and search intent aren’t simply easy, sensible guardrails for editorial groups. 

But additionally the inspiration behind writing advertising and marketing content material that additionally will get evergreen outcomes on the identical time.